Blog

Mirena IUD Lawsuit Update: Rottenstein Law Group Concerned About Implications of Study That OKs Device’s Use in Teens

05/03/2013 22:36

The Mirena IUD lawyers at the Rottenstein Law Group are concerned about a new study* that approves of the use of the hormonal IUD in teens. The firm has received many calls from women who have had the IUD surgically removed because it became embedded in their uteruses.

 

“We have filed lawsuits on behalf of women who have experienced the Mirena IUD’s serious alleged side effects,” said Rochelle Rottenstein, principal of the Rottenstein Law Group. “I’m sure the researchers acted in good faith, but in our experience their findings do not tell the whole story. Regardless, all of these studies have the potential to be included as evidence in a trial."

 

The study, published in the May 2013 edition of the Obstetrics & Gynecology medical journal, found that hormonal IUDs like Mirena were a better fit for teenagers than copper IUDs like the ParaGard. This is despite the fact that Mirena’s original target market was women who have had at least one child. In addition, women across the United States have filed lawsuits that have been consolidated at the federal level (In re: Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2434, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York) and in at least one state (In re: Application for Centralized Management of Certain Cases Involving Mirena, Morris County (N.J.) Superior Court).

 

Read full story at PRWeb.com: Mirena IUD Lawsuit Update: Rottenstein Law Group Concerned About Implications of Study That OKs Device’s Use in Teens

Virginia Woman vs Doctor for Mirena Migration Lawsuit

04/05/2013 21:58
An OB/GYN clinic and its doctor in North Carolina is facing a $2 million lawsuit filed by a woman for the doctor’s failure to detect the migration of her IUD from her uterus and its implantation into her abdomen, according to an international wire service agency. Angela Collins alleged that the doctor in Blue Ridge Gynecology & Obstetrics have neglected her concerns despite realizing that the IUD is missing from her uterus in February 2007. The doctor has failed to use any imaging device in the hope of locating the migrated IUD. Ms. Collins has experienced severe abdominal pain, yet the doctor only prescribed her with over-the-counter pain relievers over three years. In November 2010, the CT scan showed that the IUD has migrated into her abdomen. The IUD was successful removed in January 2011.
 

 

Mirena IUD Lawsuit Update: The Rottenstein Law Group Responds to Report of Lawsuits’ Effect on Bayer’s Recent Stock Performance

02/14/2013 21:54

 

NEW YORK, Feb. 12, 2013 /PRNewswire/ — The Rottenstein Law Group acknowledges a Bloomberg report about German drug manufacturer Bayer’s recent stock losses, which the story attributes to a Mirena lawsuit.
 
The company saw a 2.8 percent loss following an American woman’s lawsuit (Prendergast v. Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corp., 13-00450, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania) against Bayer, according to Bloomberg.* She alleges that the company failed to warn of the risks associated with the Mirena hormonal intrauterine device, such as the risk of ectopic pregnancy and the possibility of device embedment and migration.** As of Feb. 11th, the company stock price slump has persisted.
 
Rochelle Rottenstein , principal of the Rottenstein Law Group, said she has heard from many women who have discussed similar alleged side effects and risks associated with the Mirena IUD. The Rottenstein Law Group represents clients in Mirena lawsuits.
 

Mirena IUD: What You Need to Know

11/19/2012 22:42

As a hormonal intrauterine device, Minera is inserted into the uterus for an uninterrupted, continuous birth control.Mirena is a T-shaped plastic frame that functions by condensing the cervical mucus to prevent the sperm from reaching the egg. It also condenses the lining of the uterus and somehow regulates the ovulation.

Benefits of Mirena

Mirena offers effective, long-term method of contraception. Among these are:

Uninterrupted sex while on contraception
Remains in place for five years or more
Have it removed any time you want and you are back to your normal fertility
Menstrual bleeding is lessened after three to six months of use
Menstrual and endometriosis pain are lessened
Threats of contracting pelvic inflammatory disease due to sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are lessened
Lowers the possibility of endometrial cancer as well as cervical cancer
Even while breast-feeding it can be used, however perforations to the uterus might happen if inserted straightaway after child delivery
No side effects like those estrogen-containing birth control methods


Problems of Mirena

Mirena IUD has been linked to certain serious side effects and some of these are:
Uterus Perforation
The uterus might have a hole or lunge in the uterine wall due to Mirena.Its rupture may lead to internal scarring, infection or injury to other organs which consequently need a surgical operation.
Migration
Late detection of a perforation may allow the Mirena IUD to migrate through the intraabdominal cavity, possibly resulting in intestinal perforations, intestinal obstruction, abscesses or adhesions.
Expulsion
Half or whole Mirena IUD expulsion may occur.Younger women using Mirena IUD, women who have not had children or women who have the device inserted immediately after giving birth or abortion are the predisposing factors that expulsion may happen.
Infection
Mirena IUD may also cause infection to its users that might result to severe scarring leading to decreased fertility, and sometimes may result to death.
As a result of these serious side effects developed by users of Mirena IUD, 16 lawsuits were made against Bayer, claiming that usage of Mirena IUD caused perforated uterine wall, relocation of the device outside the uterus, and some other grave problems.Bayer later requested to have a mass tort in the state of Mirena cases for easy management, and for this reason, on August 9, 2012, the drug company sent an application to Judge Glenn A. Grant, acting administrative director of the New Jersey courts.

Reference:
womens-health.co.uk/mirena.asp

Items: 1 - 4 of 4